Search for: All records

Atlantic time‐mean heat transport is northward at all latitudes and exhibits strong multidecadal variability between about 30°N and 55°N. Atlantic heat transport variability influences many aspects of the climate system, including regional surface temperatures, subpolar heat content, Arctic sea‐ice concentration and tropical precipitation patterns. Atlantic heat transport and heat transport variability are commonly partitioned into two components: the heat transport by the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and the heat transport by the gyres. In this paper we compare four different methods for performing this partition, and we apply these methods to the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble at 34°N, 26°N and 5°S. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each method. The four methods all give significantly different estimates for the proportion of the time‐mean heat transport performed by AMOC. One of these methods is a new physically‐motivated method based on the pathway of the northward‐flowing part of AMOC. This paper presents a preliminary version of our method that works only when the AMOC follows the western boundary of the basin. All the methods agree that at 26°N, 80%–100% of heat transport variability at 2–10 years timescales is performed by AMOC, but there is more disagreement between methods in attributing multidecadal variability, with some methods showing a compensation between the AMOC and gyre heat transport variability. 

We present seismic two-way traveltime depth relationships for all sites drilled by the International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 398, Hellenic Arc Volcanic Field, using high-resolution multichannel seismic and core data. First, we filter and interpolate P-wave velocity and density data taken from (1) whole-round cores and (2) discrete measurements on half-round cores. We establish the reliability of shipboard density measurements by comparing them with in situ logging data. Using these validated measurements, we estimate acoustic impedance and synthetic seismograms. By correlating synthetic seismograms with those extracted from multichannel seismic profiles at each site, we establish time-depth relationships. We assess the quality of these relationships by examining the alignment of major lithologic boundaries with prominent unconformities or correlated conformities in the reflection seismic data. The results of this report facilitate the mapping of core data onto the multichannel seismic profiles at each site, allowing for spatial tracing of core data across the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field. 

International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 398, Hellenic Arc Volcanic Field, recovered volcanic and nonvolcanic sediments and Messinian evaporites, as well as the nonvolcanic basement. The total recovery of about 3.3 km has the potential to significantly expand our understanding of the volcanic and tectonic history of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field and the climate history of the eastern Mediterranean. Here we report semiquantitative bulk elemental analyses of X-ray fluorescence core scans for Site U1591, drilled off Christiani Island, and Site U1599, drilled off Anafi Island, and compare these to records of natural gamma radiation that were measured aboard the R/V JOIDES Resolution. 

The protection of headwater streams faces increasing challenges, exemplified by limited global recognition of headwater contributions to watershed resiliency and a recent US Supreme Court decision limiting federal safeguards. Despite accounting for ~77% of global river networks, the lack of adequate headwaters protections is caused, in part, by limited information on their extent and functions—in particular, their flow regimes, which form the foundation for decision-making regarding their protection. Yet, headwater streamflow is challenging to comprehensively measure and model; it is highly variable and sensitive to changes in land use, management and climate. Modelling headwater streamflow to quantify its cumulative contributions to downstream river networks requires an integrative understanding across local hillslope and channel (that is, watershed) processes. Here we begin to address this challenge by proposing a consistent definition for headwater systems and streams, evaluating how headwater streamflow is characterized and advocating for closing gaps in headwater streamflow data collection, modelling and synthesis. 

Site U1592 (proposed Site CSK-09A) is located ~10 km southeast of Anhydros Island in the Anafi Basin at 693 meters below sea level (mbsl) (Figure F1). The aim at the site was to penetrate the entire volcano-sedimentary fill as far as the Alpine basement to reconstruct the evolution of the Anafi Basin: history of subsidence, presence of volcanic event layers in the basin sediments, and links between volcanism and crustal tectonics. We drilled to a maximum recovery depth of 519.8 meters below seafloor (mbsf) in two holes (U1592A and U1592B), terminating in limestone basement (all depths below seafloor [mbsf] are given using the core depth below seafloor, Method A [CSF-A], scale, except in Operations where the drilling depth below seafloor [DSF] scale is used). Average core recoveries were 71% (Hole U1592A) and 50% (Hole U1592B). The Anafi Basin potentially recorded the full volcanic history of Santorini (and any older centers) since rift inception, but it was envisaged to probably also contain few eruptive products from Kolumbo. Drilling enabled reconstruction of the volcanic, sedimentary, and tectonic histories of the Anafi Basin, allowing us to compare its evolution with that of the Anhydros Basin. The site was also chosen to develop a core-log-seismic integration stratigraphy and compare it with the recently published seismic stratigraphy for the basin (Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b) and the paleotectonic reconstruction of the region (Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018). The site transects six seismic packages of the Anafi rift basin, as well as the onlap surfaces between them (Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018; Preine et al., 2022a) (Figure F2). The Anafi Basin is crossed by many seismic profiles obtained in campaigns between 2006 and 2019, many of them multichannel (Hübscher et al., 2015; Nomikou et al., 2016, 2018). It is included within the area of the 2015 PROTEUS seismic tomography experiment, during which subbottom profiling, gravity, and magnetic data were also recorded (Hooft et al., 2017). The basin bathymetry had been studied in several marine campaigns, and fault distributions and throws had been mapped (Nomikou et al., 2016; Hooft et al., 2017). Previously published analyses of the seismic data suggested the following possible interpretations (from the bottom up; Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b): Units U1 and U2: sediment packages predating Santorini and Kolumbo volcanism; Unit U3: sediments and the products of the early Kolumbo volcanism and some of the Kolumbo cones; Unit U4: sediments associated with a major rift pulse; and Units U5 and U6: sediments and the products of Santorini activity, some of the Kolumbo cones, and the later eruptions of Kolumbo including the 1650 Common Era (CE) eruption. Units U3–U6 were believed to be of Pleistocene age, and Units U1 and U2 were believed to be possibly Pliocene. The site enabled us to test these interpretations by using the cores to reconstruct a near-complete volcanic stratigraphy consistent with both onshore and offshore constraints and pinned by chronological markers from biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and sapropel records. Benthic foraminifera from fine-grained sediments provided estimates of paleowater depths and, through integration with seismic profiles and chronologic data, of time-integrated basin subsidence rates. Coring at Site U1592 in the Anafi Basin addressed scientific Objectives 1–4 and 6 of the Expedition 398 Scientific Prospectus (Druitt et al., 2022). It was complemented by Site U1589 in the Anhydros Basin because each basin taps a different sediment distributary branch of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic system. 

Site U1600 is located 10 km south of Anhydros Island within a small graben atop the Anhydros Horst (Figure F1). The Anhydros Horst separates the Anhydros Basin to the west from the Anafi Basin to the east (Preine et al., 2022a, 2022b). The water depth is 326 meters below sea level (mbsl). Permission to drill in this location was requested as Site CSK-24A and granted by the International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Environmental Protection and Safety Panel during the expedition. Three holes (U1600A–U1600C) were drilled for a total recovery depth of 184.2 meters below seafloor (mbsf) (all depths below seafloor are given using the core depth below seafloor, Method A [CSF-A] scale, except in Operations, where the drilling depth below seafloor [DSF] scale is used), with average recoveries ranging 32%–75%. The site was chosen because of its situation on the Anhydros Horst immediately east of the Kolumbo chain of volcanoes and for the well-stratified nature of the graben fill on seismic profiles (Figure F2). It seemed to be a likely site at which to drill a condensed sequence of muds and tephra for chronology, sheltered from the large-scale mass wasting of the main basins. Site U1600 is located within the area of the 2015 PROTEUS seismic tomography experiment, during which subbottom profiling, gravity, and magnetic data were also recorded (Hooft et al., 2017). Drilling at Site U1600 provided the possibility of reconstructing a near-complete volcanic stratigraphy consistent with both onshore and offshore constraints and pinned by chronological markers from biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and sapropel records. Benthic foraminifera from fine-grained sediments provided estimates of paleowater depths and, via integration with seismic profiles and chronologic data, of time-integrated basin subsidence rates. Drilling on the Anhydros Horst addressed scientific Objectives 1–4 and 6 of the Expedition 398 Scientific Prospectus (Druitt et al., 2022). 

Site U1594 (proposed Site CSK-07B) is located in the southern basin of Santorini caldera at a water depth of 291 meters below sea level (mbsl) (Figure F1). It was drilled to a maximum recovery depth of 50.1 meters below seafloor (mbsf) in a single hole (U1594A) with 93% recovery before hole instability set in and the hole was terminated (all depths below seafloor are given using the core depth below seafloor, Method A [CSF-A] scale, except in Operations where the drilling depth below seafloor [DSF] scale is used). Site U1595 addresses the same drilling objectives and lies southwest of Site U1594. Two additional sites (U1596 and U1597) lie in the northern caldera basin. Four seismic units have been recognized in the caldera (Johnston et al., 2015; Nomikou et al., 2016) (Figure F2). They were thought to consist of muds and sands from cliff mass wasting (Seismic Unit S1); compacted (possibly lithified) sandy volcaniclastics from Kameni Volcano (Unit S2); and consolidated coarse blocky intracaldera tuffs, landslide debris, and/or flood gravels (Unit S3). Unit S4 was thought to be intracaldera tuff from the Late Bronze Age eruption. The four caldera sites were planned to sample Units S1–S3; test the published correlations between the two caldera basins; penetrate below Unit S3 into Unit S4; and address scientific Objectives 1, 4, 5, and 7 of the Expedition 398 Scientific Prospectus (Druitt et al., 2022). By drilling both caldera basins and exploiting our dense seismic reflection coverage, we gained access to the 3D architecture of the entire caldera fill. We also targeted the question of why the northern basin is 100 m deeper than the southern one. Finally, we tested whether Unit S3 consisted of flood debris from the caldera flooding event (Nomikou et al., 2016) or was Late Bronze Age intracaldera tuff (Johnston et al., 2015). The intracaldera sites were used for microbiological work of scientific Objective 7.